Our View: New Bedford Problem Properties need two-part solution

“;
document.getElementById(‘premiumMsg’).innerHTML = contentStr;
document.getElementById(‘premiumMsg’).style.display = “block”;
} else if (userSingleSale == “Reguser”) {
contentStr = “”;
document.getElementById(‘premiumMsg’).innerHTML = contentStr;
document.getElementById(‘premiumMsg’).style.display = “block”;
} else if (userSingleSale == “PREMIUM01″) {
document.getElementById(‘premiumMsg’).style.display = “none”;
}

It’s been a year since New Bedford Mayor Jon Mitchell’s first attempt at an ordinance that tries to hold accountable landlords of “problem properties.”

The new version was worked out with the City Council’s Ordinance Committee and reflects good compromise on the differences between the administration and the council.

It was wise to exclude the sticky issue of code violations from the ordinance, allowing the drafters to focus on police issues.

However, that means they should waste no time before tackling code violations.

Handling problem properties, that is, rental properties where public safety or sanitary issues are present, entails oversight by police, fire, health and building departments. The proposed ordinance deserves passage by the City Council, but that only covers the Police Department’s authority to make sure tenants have safe and healthy neighborhoods, and that landlords’ property is protected. Non-judicial enforcement of health, fire and building codes is just as important to the process, and just as important to protecting rights of both tenants and landlords.

When first brought to the council last August, the mayor had hoped to implement a $25-per-unit inspection fee in buildings of 10 or fewer units every three years. Council members objected at the time, arguing against “taxing” even the landlords who were careful about whom they rented to, and were conscientious about their property.

The fee would go toward paying for the city’s code inspections, and would give landlords and tenants each the benefit of setting a baseline for the condition of an apartment before move-in.

Leaving this work undone would be a greater “tax” than the 50 cents per week paid into the enforcement system.

This should be seen as a first attempt, just as the police ordinance needed cooperation and compromise between the administration and City Council. Whether $25 is the right amount should be left to another negotiation process.

But it should not be left undone. The sooner the new proposal is passed, and the sooner a code ordinance is drafted and passed, the sooner good landlords and tenants will be able to feel secure in their businesses and homes, and the sooner those for whom the ordinances are designed are held to account for their shortcomings and derelictions.


div{padding:0px !important;}
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-login-widget{display:inline;float:left;padding:0px;margin:5px;font-weight:bold;color:height:30px;line-height:30px;}
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-login-widget h3{padding:0px;margin:0px;}
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-login-widget a{font-weight:bold;color:}
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-comments .vf-comments-meta{display:inline;margin:0px;padding:0px;}
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-comments .vf-comments-meta .vf-left{text-align: right;float: right;padding:0px;margin:5px;color: height:30px;line-height:30px;}
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-comments .vf-comments-meta .vf-left b{font-size:12px; font-weight: bold;}
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-comments .vf-comments-meta .vf-right{display:none;} /* hide Viafoura logo */
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-comment-box{margin:0px !important;padding:0px;}
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-comment-box .vf-upload-item{display:none !important;}/* hide upload buttons */
/* parent comment thread */
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-comment-thread{background-color:
margin: 5px 0px 0px 0px;
padding: 5px;
border: 1px solid
border-radius: 8px 8px 8px 8px;}
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-comment-container {margin:0px;padding:0px;border:none;}
/* child comment thread */
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-child-comments .vf-comment-container {border: 1px solid border-radius: 8px 8px 8px 8px; padding:5px; margin: 5px 0px 0px 68px;}
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-rank{display:none;} /* hide user rank */
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-comment-box .vf-comment-submit {-webkit-border-radius: 3px; -moz-border-radius: 3px; border-radius: 3px;}
#ReaderReaction .viafoura select, #ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-btn {
display: inline-block;
padding: 4px 10px 4px; margin:0px;
font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px;
color: cursor: pointer;
text-align: center; vertical-align: middle;
text-shadow: 0 1px 1px rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.75);
background-color:
background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(top, #ffffff, #e6e6e6);
background-image: -ms-linear-gradient(top, #ffffff, #e6e6e6);
background-image: -webkit-gradient(linear, 0 0, 0 100%, from(#ffffff), to(#e6e6e6));
background-image: -webkit-linear-gradient(top, #ffffff, #e6e6e6);
background-image: -o-linear-gradient(top, #ffffff, #e6e6e6);
background-image: linear-gradient(top, #ffffff, #e6e6e6);
background-repeat: repeat-x;
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorstr=’#ffffff’, endColorstr=’#e6e6e6′, GradientType=0);
border-color: #e6e6e6 #e6e6e6
border-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1) rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1) rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.25);
border: 1px solid
-webkit-border-radius: 3px; -moz-border-radius: 3px; border-radius: 3px;
-webkit-box-shadow: inset 0 1px 0 rgba(255,255,255,.2), 0 1px 2px rgba(0,0,0,.05);
-moz-box-shadow: inset 0 1px 0 rgba(255,255,255,.2), 0 1px 2px rgba(0,0,0,.05);
box-shadow: inset 0 1px 0 rgba(255,255,255,.2), 0 1px 2px rgba(0,0,0,.05);
}
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-btn:hover, #ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-btn:active {
background-color:
}
#ReaderReaction .viafoura .vf-comment-replies{font-weight:bold; margin:5px 0px 0px 68px; border: 1px solid -webkit-border-radius: 3px; -moz-border-radius: 3px; border-radius: 3px;}
#ReaderReaction .readerWarning{clear:both;margin:10px !important;}
]]>
We reserve the right to remove any content at any time from this Community, including without limitation if it violates the
Community Rules. We ask that you report content that you in good faith believe violates the above rules by clicking the Flag link next to the offending comment or fill out this form. New comments are only accepted for two weeks from the date of publication.

Article source: http://www.southcoasttoday.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20140822/OPINION/408220309/-1/NEWS

Posted in Properties a News |

North Nicollet Mall-area properties sold for $100M

A huge chunk of real estate near the northern stretch of Nicollet Mall has been sold to a San Francisco firm for $100 million, according to a source with knowledge of the deal who prefers to remain anonymous. The properties, … Continue reading

Posted in Properties a News |

5 Things American Realty Capital Properties Inc.’s Management Wants You to …

American Realty Capital Propertiesdelivered strong results in the second quarter as it topped the expectations of Wall Street, and saw its adjusted funds from operations rise by 26% during the last year. But the reality is, while the results were … Continue reading

Posted in Properties a News |

JPSO closes on Fat City properties, prepares to move 1st District station – The Times-Picayune

The Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office recently closed on the last of four lots in Fat City that will serve as the future home of the department’s new 1st District Patrol Station. The Sheriff’s Office spent a little over $1.5 million to acquire … Continue reading

Posted in Properties a News |

With Fair Oaks-Howe site sold, city considers other surplus properties

Escrow has closed for a piece of land at Fair Oaks Boulevard and Howe Avenue previously owned by the city of Sacramento. New owner Petrovich Development Co. plans a retail center on those 3.1 acres. Escrow has closed for a … Continue reading

Posted in Properties a News |

Landlord set to sell his key properties in Adams Village

Arthur S. Murphy owns property on both sides of Adams Street, including the two-story commercial building at 526 Gallivan Blvd., shown on the right. Photo by Bill Forry The owner of two key commercial buildings in Adams Corner intends to … Continue reading

Posted in Properties a News |

New website lists underused or empty buildings owned by government

Members of the public who have ever looked at a rather forlorn building and hankered after buying it can find out if it is in government hands through a website launched on Wednesday by the Cabinet Office – and make … Continue reading

Posted in Properties a News |

Concord residents air grievances about troubled properties

Email Print Comments (1) The property on Washington Street. The one on Jackson Street. The other on Union, and on North State, and on Wall, and South Spring and Monroe. The time a man urinated on top of a car. … Continue reading

Posted in Properties a News |

FEMA halts flood assistance for properties with gas leases – Scranton Times

MESHOPPEN TWP. — In fall 2011, about a month after the flooded Meshoppen Creek spilled over its banks and into their basement, Pete and Sharon Morgan applied for federal flood assistance to help them move out of their home. They … Continue reading

Posted in Properties a News |

Allentown to discuss blighted properties Oct. 1

ALLENTOWN, Pa. – Allentown City Council will hold a special meeting about blighted properties in the city at 6 p.m. Oct. 1. And within a month, council will schedule a different special meeting to update West End residents about steps … Continue reading

Posted in Properties a News |